Unsere Regeln! » New Jersey gambling regulators

are investigating whether FanDuel's sports book should pay out more than $82 Tim Brown Jersey ,000 to a man who was given exorbitant odds for the Denver Broncos to win Sunday against the Oakland Raiders.Anthony Prince of Newark made his bet and was handed a ticket at incredible 750-1 odds with about a minute left in the game, as the Broncos trailed by 2 points on their final drive. Denver kicked a field goal with 6 seconds left to win 20-19, capping a second half comeback that started with the Broncos down 12-0.FanDuel says its system should have calculated his odds at 1-6, meaning a bettor would have to wager $600 in order to win $100.Prince bet $110 on the Broncos but was stopped when he went to collect from FanDuel's betting window at the Meadowlands Racetrack in East Rutherford, New Jersey."They said, 'Oh, we can't honor this ticket,'" Prince told News12 New Jersey, which first reported the story. "I said, 'Why? This is fair and square.' They said the system had a glitch in it and they're not obligated to pay for glitches."FanDuel said in a statement that its system malfunctioned and it is not obligated to pay out on an obvious error."A small number of bets were made at the erroneous price over an 18 second period. We honored all such bets on the Broncos to win the game at the accurate market price in accordance with our house rules and industry practice, which specifically address such obvious pricing errors," FanDuel said in its statement. "We have reached out to all impacted customers and apologized for the error."How the matter is handled could have far-reaching effects on the budding sports betting industry in New Jersey at a time when new sports books are opening in some other states and lawmakers throughout the country consider whether to also jump in for the potential tax revenue. New Jersey challenged a federal ban and won a U.S. Supreme Court decision in May that cleared the way for gambling on games to expand beyond Nevada.The idea that player money and winnings would be protected and regulated by the state has been a major selling point among sports betting supporters who contrasted legal gambling with shady offshore betting sites where players often have little recourse in disputes.But gambling regulators also have policies in place to void obvious errors in sports bets.David Rebuck Ted Hendricks Jersey , director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement, said the agency is investigating whether there are grounds to compel FanDuel to pay Prince the stated payout of $82,000. He added the agency is looking "just as importantly @ how it occurred given internal controls exist to prevent such an error. Those findings might also result in the need for further action."FanDuel's operation just a few miles from New York made $3 million in its first full month in August and quickly became the most popular sports book in New Jersey.FanDuel declined to say how many bets were made at the incorrect odds.Prince said FanDuel offered him $500 and some tickets to future New York Giants games, adding he should take the offer because they're not obligated to give him anything."I said, 'Wow, for real?'" Prince said. "You'd rather go to the corner bookies now; you're not getting paid here."Follow Wayne Parry at ://WayneParryAC It’s quite amazing just how bad the Raiders were at getting to the quarterback this season. They came into their season finale against the Chiefs dead last by a large margin with 13.0 sacks on the season. And they left with an even wider margin.They didn’t put up one sack on Pat Mahomes in Kansas City Sunday. The closest they had was Arden Key getting into the backfield on the third play of the game. But as has been an issue with Key all season long, he was unable to close the deal. Instead of what would have been a sack, leading to a punt out of their own end zone, Mahomes spun out of Key’s grasp and completed a 12-yard pass for the first down. Three plays later, Tyreek Hill would break open and Mahomes would complete a pass to him for a 67-yard touchdown.On the flipside, Derek Carr was sacked three times. The first of those sacks saw Justin Houston come around the left edge and knocked the ball out of Carr’s hand as he tried to throw. Carr double pumped it, allowing Houston enough time to get around left tackle Kolton Miller for the strip sack and recovery. The Chiefs would take over at their own 40-yard-line and they would drive for their third touchdown to take a 21-0 lead.The second sack was also a strip sack Dave Casper Jersey , but this time Doug Martin was there to recover it. That one saw Brandon Parker give up initial pressure on the right side to Justin Houston and then Miller allow Dee Ford to crash the pocket for the sack.Two rookie tackles isn’t ideal for any team and the two have been pretty brutal for the Raiders this year, allowing 52 sacks this season. Despite Carr’s previous most sacks allowed being 31 (2015) and his sack total this season being more than his previous two seasons combined (36), Carr took some blame for the sacks.“Physically it was hard. Just calling it what it is. It was tough, but that’s my job. Gotta do that sometimes,” said Carr of the number of sacks he took this year. “I look at it and say ‘man [52] is there half those that I could’ve erased? Could I have thrown it at somebody’s feet? Could I have check some off when it wasn’t the premiere look? . . Hopefully we’ll get back to work and figure out how to eliminate my portion of those because it’s not all on the offensive linemen.”With no Raiders getting a hand on Mahomes again in the game, they would finish -3 in sack differential in the game, setting a new franchise record low -39 sack differential.That is tied for the 8th worst sack differential in NFL history, and the second worst in the past 16 years, behind only the 1-win 2016 Browns. So, obviously a recipe for losing games.Follow @LeviDamien